From the monthly archives:

February 2008

Google AdWords on trademarks: Who wants to know?

by Scott McAndrew on February 17, 2008

A client recently inquired about their competitors AdWords advertisements showing up when you searched on their company name. While I hadn’t researched the topic before, common sense gave me two guesses on what the policy would hold:

  • Competitor trademarks cannot be used to initiate the display of AdWords ads (you cannot use a defensible trademark as a keyword to bid upon)
  • Competitor trademarks cannot be used in AdWords adcopy

That was my initial thought. Then I thought it through a bit more. There are trademarks that would make this very difficult to adhere to (Target, Southwest, etc.). This would be a nightmare to monitor. How could they do it?

The answer: they don’t. Well, sort of.

A review of the AdWords Help Center validated the sum of my thinking. From the AdWords Help Center:

When we receive a complaint from a trademark owner, we only investigate the use of the trademark in ad text. If the advertiser is using the trademark in ad text, we will require the advertiser to remove the trademark and prevent them from using it in ad text in the future. Please note that we will not disable keywords in response to a trademark complaint.

So you can bid on a trademarked term, you just can’t use it in the ad text. Wow. That is pretty biased towards Google’s best interest. It creates bidding wars. Those trademarked brands must hate the policy. Can you imagine a Target vs. Wal-Mart keyword bidding war? United Airlines vs. Southwest Airlines? With Google’s (undisclosed) take as the auction-based ad broker, that must be an incredibly profitable policy.

Well, those types of wars don’t happen for the big boys, apparently that’s just reserved for the mom-and-pop shops. Here’s just a few examples where the policy is suspiciously absent:

Search term: target – AdWords ads: none
Search term: united – AdWords ads: none
Search term: southwest – AdWords ads: none

No AdWords for the term \'Southwest\'?

Doesn’t exactly seem fair, does it?

Of interest elsewhere on the web:

{ 0 comments }

17 February 2008

Popular social networking sites around the world

In the past ten days I’ve been asked three times what social networking sites were in favor outside the United States.  I had an idea of what sites were popular for a few countries, but turned to the Internet to find out more over the weekend.  Some I’d heard of, some I hadn’t.
Below I’ve provided [...]

0 comments Read the full article →
9 February 2008

How to promote a blog for free

Have a blog to promote? Tips tips will help. And, they are all free!

14 comments Read the full article →
5 February 2008

Microsoft to Google: Our lawyer thinks your lawyer is wrong

Microsoft’s response to… Google’s response to… Microsoft’s bid for Yahoo (hey, I wonder what they think).

0 comments Read the full article →
3 February 2008

Google: Microsoft’s Yahoo bid bad for innovation, consumers, Internet

Google takes critical aim at Microsoft’s history, character and intent in response to last week’s bid for Yahoo.

0 comments Read the full article →
1 February 2008

Google’s Matt Cutts on content duplication penalty

Google’s Matt Cutts weighs in on the syndication of original content on the same web site and on the web at large.

3 comments Read the full article →
1 February 2008

Yahooooooo! Check out the big brain on Ballmer.

With Microsoft and Yahoo’s online efforts consistently marginalized by Google’s dominance in search and online advertising it’s hard to envision the proposed acquisition happening.

0 comments Read the full article →