<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Analytics: 00:00:00 Avg. Time on Site?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/analytics-time_on_site-bounce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/analytics-time_on_site-bounce/</link>
	<description>Results-oriented Internet Marketing — Scott McAndrew</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:05:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben H</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/analytics-time_on_site-bounce/comment-page-1/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/?p=92#comment-833</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great discussion.  I think yours is the best on point.  I&#039;ve directed people I&#039;ve helped in your direction from Doodgical.com (if you happen to see that in your analytics).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great discussion.  I think yours is the best on point.  I&#8217;ve directed people I&#8217;ve helped in your direction from Doodgical.com (if you happen to see that in your analytics).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bounce = Google Analytics Average Time on Site 00:00:00 &#124; Totally Doodgical</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/analytics-time_on_site-bounce/comment-page-1/#comment-832</link>
		<dc:creator>Bounce = Google Analytics Average Time on Site 00:00:00 &#124; Totally Doodgical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 22:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/?p=92#comment-832</guid>
		<description>[...] Reference:  Scott McAndrew [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reference:  Scott McAndrew [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamie</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/analytics-time_on_site-bounce/comment-page-1/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/?p=92#comment-812</guid>
		<description>thanks for the tip, I was thinking my content was rubbish with the 0:00:00 but that explains alot</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the tip, I was thinking my content was rubbish with the 0:00:00 but that explains alot</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/analytics-time_on_site-bounce/comment-page-1/#comment-811</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 04:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/?p=92#comment-811</guid>
		<description>Cheers for that. Nice, short, clear. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers for that. Nice, short, clear. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torrey</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/analytics-time_on_site-bounce/comment-page-1/#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>Torrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/?p=92#comment-699</guid>
		<description>Great.  That had me freaking out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great.  That had me freaking out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Stauffer</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/analytics-time_on_site-bounce/comment-page-1/#comment-691</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Stauffer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 13:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/?p=92#comment-691</guid>
		<description>This post explained a lot. I was very upset to see that I had a 100% bounce rate with 0:00 time on site but now I feel somewhat better. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This post explained a lot. I was very upset to see that I had a 100% bounce rate with 0:00 time on site but now I feel somewhat better. <img src='http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoga Training</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/analytics-time_on_site-bounce/comment-page-1/#comment-622</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoga Training</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 20:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/?p=92#comment-622</guid>
		<description>That explains alot - I&#039;ve been using the &quot;download speed test&quot; for days now - thinking that my host is having problems - but now I can stop all the site download speed tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That explains alot &#8211; I&#39;ve been using the &#8220;download speed test&#8221; for days now &#8211; thinking that my host is having problems &#8211; but now I can stop all the site download speed tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scottmcandrew</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/analytics-time_on_site-bounce/comment-page-1/#comment-590</link>
		<dc:creator>scottmcandrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/?p=92#comment-590</guid>
		<description>Yes, you&#039;re understanding it correctly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you&#39;re understanding it correctly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: muiomuio</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/analytics-time_on_site-bounce/comment-page-1/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>muiomuio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 11:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/?p=92#comment-587</guid>
		<description>Interesting article but I think I didn&#039;t quite understood. Google Analytics needs 2 points to know how long a user was on the website the time the 1st page was requested and the time another page was requested. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If another page isn&#039;t requested that visitor will be considerer as a bounce and it&#039;s time on site will be counted as 00:00:00. Is this correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article but I think I didn&#39;t quite understood. Google Analytics needs 2 points to know how long a user was on the website the time the 1st page was requested and the time another page was requested. </p>
<p>If another page isn&#39;t requested that visitor will be considerer as a bounce and it&#39;s time on site will be counted as 00:00:00. Is this correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Los Angeles Movers</title>
		<link>http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/analytics-time_on_site-bounce/comment-page-1/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Los Angeles Movers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onlinemarketingperformance.com/?p=92#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that clarification, I was thinking that maybe it&#039;s counting bot/spider visits as zero duration because they are not real visitors. But now that I think of it, Google is probably smarter than that and doesn&#039;t count spiders at all in Analytics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that clarification, I was thinking that maybe it&#8217;s counting bot/spider visits as zero duration because they are not real visitors. But now that I think of it, Google is probably smarter than that and doesn&#8217;t count spiders at all in Analytics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
