Posts tagged as:

Reputation Management

A Royal social marketing mess?

by Scott McAndrew on March 18, 2009

Have you heard of Royal Caribbean’s Royal Champions program? The marketing program allegedly rewarded forum posters who posted positive reviews about Royal Caribbean on popular social sites including Cruise Critic and TripAdvisor.

Loose lips sink ships

The online marketing company I work for, Terralever, had an opportunity to comment on a follow-up to original story which was posted on msnbc.com’s site titled Does cruise line’s viral campaign cross the line? Here’s an excerpt from that article:

By utilizing a “complex formula of data mining,” the cruise line selected 50 individuals based on the “quality and quantity of their posts with many having over 10,000 message board posts on various Royal Caribbean topics,” the Consumer Insights Group article said. The majority of posts were found on Cruise Critic. After individuals were chosen for the program, their posts were “carefully monitored during events and on a regular basis to ensure that posts remain positive and frequent.”

The post also states that Royal Champions were rewarded with all-expense paid pre-inaugural sailings along with invites to events and cocktail parties hosted by Royal Caribbean executives.

Based on the aforementioned information (and some time on the Cruise Critic forums) I provided a response which appears in a follow-up article that was posted to the msnbc.com website on Monday (Marketing campaign sinks Cruise Critic).  Here’s an excerpt with my quote included:

“The two hallmarks of social media are authenticity and transparency. It would appear that Royal Caribbean had a breakdown on both of these fronts,” says Jonathan Heit, senior vice president of digital media for Allison & Partners, which has implemented digital strategies for brands ranging from Philosophy to the Hard Rock Hotel in Las Vegas.

“What’s curious is why Royal Caribbean would even walk this line,” says Scott McAndrew, director of strategy at Terralever. McAndrew says Royal Caribbean has a good brand reputation and a loyal and vocal fan before starting the program.

“In trying to shortcut the natural progress from brand exposure, to brand adoption and finally advocacy, Royal Caribbean now faces a far worse problem,” he adds. “All the wholehearted, genuine reviews of their brand and service that are positive run the risk of being eyed with a jaded view. Is this a real review, or is this one they bought?”

What do you think?  If you read posts by a compensated advocate of a brand in a social context online, would you feel slighted?

Photograph by J.L. McVay

Elsewhere on the web

{ 5 comments }

Math and… better math on the State of the Union

by Scott McAndrew on January 30, 2008

Following Monday’s State of the Union Address, both Time Magazine and Slate posted an analysis of its content on their site.  Time bunted; Slate swung for the fences.

Time’s visualization went with a view which scaled the size of the words in proportion to their frequency.  Think tag cloud.  The basic visualization technique was posted under the heading “State of the Union by the Numbers”.  Yawn.

Time Magazine’s Visualization of the State of the Union Address

With a simple explanation of how the technique works, a teenager could whip this out with a steno pad and a pencil.  The hardest part would be making it through the whole speech.  Reporting.  Not analysis.

Slate Magazine took a very different approach.  And they knew their results were in a different neighborhood than what Time and others were up to.  Slate’s work-up relied on the slick natural-language processing algorithms baked into Crawdad Technologies’ software.  A bit different than a simple counting exercise.  An excerpt from the Slate article (A Computer Reads the State of the Union):

By natural-language-processing standards, simply counting the frequency of words is unthinkably primitive. As computers get better at understanding the structure of sentences—think about that corrugated green line under a sentence in Microsoft Word reminding you to avoid the passive voice—they can do a much more thorough job reading political speeches and offering their insights.

Needless to say, Slate’s experiment is just a bit more interesting.  Looking at not only last night’s State of the Union, but all of Bush’s Presidential addresses, the software identified “four distinct voices” during his time in the White House:

  1. “Domestic Bush” – 2001
  2. “Security Bush” – 2002, 2003
  3. “Visionary Bush” – 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007
  4. “Legacy Bush” – 2008

The table below provides further insight.

Computer Linguistic Analysis of Bush’s Addresses

For another example of their technology in action, visit the Wonkosphere, currently tracking buzz online surrounding the 2008 Presidential raceLearn more about Crawdad Technologies and their software at their web site, crawdadtech.com.

What does this have to do with online marketing?  Good natural-language processing technology is a Swiss Army knife for measuring buzz—and its tone—online.  Before stumbling across Crawdad I had planned to post about a few companies I’ve been interested in whose offerings cater to online marketers.  As with Crawdad’s Wonkosphere, these solutions focus on monitoring social media outlets.  A few of those companies: Nielsen (BuzzMetrics), Radian6 and Relevant Noise.

{ 0 comments }

27 January 2008

Online reputation management and the power of consumer opinion

Marketers are highly considerate of how their brand is represented in digital media they create for online consumption but largely ignore what others are saying about them online.

Read the full article →